We continue with our presentation of the five points of Calvinism. We are still on the second point of Calvinism (Unconditional Election the U) and now consider the rejection of errors. We lay out Arminus&#8217; understanding of Romans 9 and then offer a Reformed response. Our response in sum is that there is no basis to take Jacob and Esau as types as Arminus wants to read this text through Galatians 4. (Please see the Lyrics section for all the texts cited).
&nbsp;
Web Site &#8211; <a href="http://www.fresnourc.com">www.fresnourc.com</a> 
Facebook Page &#8211; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/fresnourc">www.facebook.com/fresnourc</a> 
YouTube &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/fresnocurc">www.youtube.com/user/fresnocurc</a> 
iTunes &#8211; <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/covenant-urcs/id373736493?mt=2">itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/covenant-urcs/id373736493?mt=2</a>
&nbsp;
The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.fresnourc.com/unconditional-election-2-summary-of-dordt-romans-9/">Unconditional Election (2): Summary of Dordt (Romans 9)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.fresnourc.com">Covenant United Reformed Church</a>.

Limited Atonement: Summary of Dordt (John 3; I John 2:2)

Here are summaries of the five points of Calvinism. We consider what the Arminian teaches trying to lay out the best argument for their case. Then we lay out the response from the Reformed side of things. I hope you find it helpful.