365 Days of Philosophy
365 Days of Philosophy
Kylie Sturgess
365DaysOfPhilosophy 347 — Fallacies in Debate III
1 minutes Posted Dec 14, 2017 at 1:53 pm.
0:00
1:09
Download MP3
Show notes

Analyse the following debate and identify how well the debate unfolds — are there any fallacies involved, and what are they?

Rachel: We should accept other’s opinions and if we really want a peaceful society, we should respect different beliefs. An inclusive, liberal society is the best way to live.

Phoebe: Well, I’ve never heard of anything so unrealistic. Tolerance of unethical or inhumane practices is hardly a good society, so you can either live in extreme brutality or deal with limited expression.

Rachel: I have no idea what you’re talking about. A liberal society is just about freedom to express your beliefs, it’s hardly about enforcing them. Most people don’t have issues with each other, so it shouldn’t be a problem.

Phoebe: What do you mean? If I express the belief that women should be enslaved, I should be charged with hate-speech. Enslaving women is denying their freedom; denying freedom is unethical and inhumane, so it’s the equivalent of making slaves of women. I’d rather have limitations that keep us free.

Put your comments here — answers for Patreons tomorrow at patreon.com/kyliesturgess.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.